{"id":99855,"date":"2026-09-07T04:48:41","date_gmt":"2026-09-07T04:48:41","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/?p=99855"},"modified":"2026-09-07T16:39:55","modified_gmt":"2026-09-07T16:39:55","slug":"three-shipping-crises-redraw-global-wood-trade-routes","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/ro\/three-shipping-crises-redraw-global-wood-trade-routes\/","title":{"rendered":"Three shipping crises redraw global wood trade routes"},"content":{"rendered":"

Ocean freight has stopped moving as a single market for lumber, panels and pulp. Shanghai\u2013Rotterdam rates fell in early September as carriers cautiously restored Suez capacity, while Gulf deliveries became more difficult after traffic through Hormuz returned to its lowest level since May. In the Black Sea, the availability and insurance cost of acceptable tonnage are increasingly more important than the nominal distance between loading and discharge ports.<\/p>\n

For current wood transactions, this divergence changes the calculation behind every CFR and CIF offer. Lower benchmark container rates do not necessarily produce a lower landed price once bunker surcharges, transshipment risk, reduced free time and possible discharge at an alternative port are included. The variables now are the actual routing used by the carrier, the validity of the freight quotation and who carries the cost when the booked destination can no longer be served.<\/p>\n

This is no longer comparable to the broad container shortage during the pandemic, when almost every major route moved in the same direction. Vessel capacity exists, but it is being redistributed unevenly between the Cape of Good Hope, Suez, the Gulf and the principal east\u2013west trades. A shipment from Asia to northern Europe may cost less than it did several weeks ago, while a European cargo destined for the Gulf can face a higher risk premium, a shorter booking window and no firm assurance that it will be discharged at the port originally nominated.<\/p>\n

For cargoes with a relatively low value per cubic metre, the spread between the published rate and the final logistics cost is becoming more important. Port-substitution rights, war-risk surcharges, detention, demurrage and inland collection from an alternative port can now determine whether the original margin survives the voyage.<\/p>\n

\n
Freight conditions across the principal wood trade corridors<\/div>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Trade corridor<\/th>\nCurrent freight condition<\/th>\nCommercial effect<\/th>\nPoint requiring confirmation<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
Asia\u2013Northern Europe<\/td>\nSpot rates declining as some capacity returns through Suez<\/td>\nLower CFR levels are possible, but transit times still depend on the route actually used<\/td>\nSuez or Cape routing; transshipment port; destination free time<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Europe\u2013Gulf<\/td>\nLimited predictability following the renewed reduction in Hormuz traffic<\/td>\nShorter quotation validity and greater risk of discharge outside the nominated Gulf port<\/td>\nPort-substitution clause; war-risk surcharge; inland cost allocation<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Europe\u2013Asia via Suez<\/td>\nShorter rotations becoming available, although carrier policies remain inconsistent<\/td>\nPotentially faster delivery and lower inventory-financing costs<\/td>\nPermanent return to Suez or selected transits only<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Black Sea\u2013Mediterranean<\/td>\nVessel acceptance and insurance assessed shipment by shipment<\/td>\nThe lowest freight indication may not remain executable during the agreed loading window<\/td>\nVessel approval; insurance cover; laycan flexibility; replacement tonnage<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Global long-haul routes<\/td>\nBase rates and bunker costs beginning to move in opposite directions<\/td>\nFalling quotations may be offset by fuel and security surcharges<\/td>\nComplete surcharge structure and rate-validity date<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Source: GWMI assessment based on shipping-market information available on September 7, 2026.<\/p>\n

Hormuz disruption changes Gulf offers<\/h2>\n

Traffic through the Strait of Hormuz weakened again at the beginning of September following renewed attacks involving US and Iranian forces. During the ten days to September 6, an average of ten commodity vessels per day passed through the strait, the lowest level since May. Only two transits were recorded on September 5 and six on the following day.<\/p>\n

The immediate consequence is not the disappearance of Gulf business but a deterioration in the reliability of delivered quotations. Carriers may continue accepting bookings for the region while retaining the contractual right to change the discharge port, postpone the sailing or move the cargo through another transshipment hub. The quoted freight can remain technically valid while the commercial assumptions behind it change substantially.<\/p>\n

If direct access to a nominated Gulf port becomes unavailable or commercially unacceptable to the carrier, cargo may be redirected to Fujairah or to Omani ports such as Sohar and Duqm. The buyer must then arrange road transport or wait for onward sea capacity. Additional handling, storage, customs procedures and inland movement can remove the price advantage on which the original purchase was based.<\/p>\n

Offers into the region are consequently being exposed to shorter validity periods and more frequent freight reconfirmation. A rate held open for several weeks can become a liability if the carrier introduces a war-risk surcharge or changes the route before loading. FOB business transfers more of that exposure to the buyer, while CFR and CIF terms give the seller control of the booking but increase its exposure to subsequent logistics changes.<\/p>\n

Port substitution should be addressed directly in the sales contract. A carrier\u2019s right to discharge at the nearest port considered safe does not automatically determine how the resulting inland, storage and customs costs are divided between seller and buyer. Without an agreed provision, a shipment can fulfil the ocean bill of lading and still generate a dispute over commercial delivery.<\/p>\n

Red Sea return pushes Asia\u2013Europe rates lower<\/h2>\n

The Red Sea is moving in the opposite commercial direction, although not yet toward full normalisation. Several major carriers have increased Suez Canal transits because the Cape of Good Hope diversion is expensive, lengthens vessel rotations and absorbs capacity. CMA CGM, Maersk, MSC, Cosco and Wan Hai have operated services through the corridor, but carriers continue to apply different risk policies and are not restoring their networks at the same speed.<\/p>\n

Cape diversions have absorbed an estimated 5\u20137% of global container capacity, equivalent to approximately 1.7\u20132.4 million TEU. As part of that capacity returns to shorter Suez rotations, space is released elsewhere and spot rates come under pressure.<\/p>\n

Drewry\u2019s World Container Index stood at $4,465 per 40-foot container on September 3. Shanghai\u2013Rotterdam fell by 5% in one week to $4,092, while Shanghai\u2013Genoa declined by 10% to $4,368. The global index remained 112% higher than a year earlier, but the weekly movement confirms that the principal routes are no longer advancing together.<\/p>\n

\n
Drewry container spot rates \u2014 September 3, 2026<\/div>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Route \/ index<\/th>\nUS$ per 40ft container<\/th>\nWeekly change<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
Drewry World Container Index<\/td>\n$4,465<\/td>\nUnchanged<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Shanghai\u2013Rotterdam<\/td>\n$4,092<\/td>\n\u22125%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Shanghai\u2013Genoa<\/td>\n$4,368<\/td>\n\u221210%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Shanghai\u2013Los Angeles<\/td>\n$7,185<\/td>\n+5%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Shanghai\u2013New York<\/td>\n$9,587<\/td>\n+3%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Source: Drewry World Container Index. Rates refer to a 40-foot container.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

The decline creates room to renegotiate freight for September and October arrivals, particularly on FOB business. The saving is commercially relevant only when the carrier confirms the route, expected transit time and destination conditions. A cheaper Cape service and a Suez service should not be treated as equivalent quotations simply because both terminate at the same port.<\/p>\n

A Suez transit releases working capital earlier and reduces the probability of the cargo arriving outside a contractual delivery window. A Cape booking may remain acceptable where timing is less important, but the rate must compensate for additional inventory financing and the longer period during which the goods remain unavailable.<\/p>\n

The return to Suez also carries a temporary congestion risk. Vessels using the shorter corridor can reach Europe close to ships that departed earlier around the Cape. If several rotations converge, pressure on terminals, container depots, rail services and truck appointments can increase dwell times even while the ocean rate declines. In these circumstances, destination free time may be worth more than a small reduction in the headline rate.<\/p>\n

<\/a><\/p>\n

Black Sea freight is increasingly priced vessel by vessel<\/h2>\n

The Black Sea has developed into a separate freight market in which the origin, beneficial ownership and recent trading history of the vessel can matter as much as its size and position. Commercial ships have recently passed through the Bosporus with nets, tyres and water-filled containers installed as improvised protection against drones. Several vessels have arrived damaged, while attacks on ports and export infrastructure have increased.<\/p>\n

The impact extends beyond cargoes directly connected with Ukraine or Russia. Regional wood shipments compete with grain, metals and energy commodities for acceptable tonnage, insurance capacity and port access. Disruption in those larger commodity flows therefore changes wood freight even when no forest-products cargo is directly affected.<\/p>\n

A nominal rate from a Black Sea port can no longer be separated from the probability that the nominated vessel will complete loading. Owners may withdraw before laycan, insurers may revise their conditions after the fixture, or a port closure may prevent the ship from entering during the agreed window. Cheaper but less certain tonnage can produce a higher final cost than a firmer vessel positioned farther away.<\/p>\n

Rail and road routes through neighbouring European countries remain available for part of the trade, but the additional cost extends beyond the transport tariff. Border waiting times, wagon availability, transloading and container repositioning have to be included in the delivered calculation. Port flexibility provides another option, although the internal haulage required to switch terminals must be priced before the alternative is offered.<\/p>\n

Russian-origin shipments face the additional burden of vessel screening, sanctions compliance, banking restrictions and insurance scrutiny. Even where the underlying transaction is legally permitted, carriers and financial institutions can impose stricter internal requirements. A theoretically open route can therefore offer little commercially usable capacity.<\/p>\n

Container and breakbulk economics diverge<\/h2>\n

The present disruption increases the difference between containerised and breakbulk shipments. Containers remain practical for smaller parcels and frequent deliveries, but the shipper has limited control over routing and discharge decisions. A carrier may alter the transshipment port, omit a call or discharge the container at another safe location under the bill of lading.<\/p>\n

A breakbulk or full-vessel shipment gives the charterer greater control over the voyage, laycan and destination. It can also reduce the unit cost for a sufficiently large parcel. The exposure is concentrated, however: a delayed or rejected vessel affects the entire cargo rather than a limited number of containers, while demurrage can accumulate quickly if the loading port closes or documentation is not ready.<\/p>\n

The comparison now depends less on the initial rate than on parcel size, destination flexibility and the cost of delay. Breakbulk becomes more attractive where sufficient volume exists and the parties can negotiate destination and security provisions directly with the owner. Containers retain the advantage where the trade requires smaller deliveries, but port-substitution and transshipment terms require closer attention.<\/p>\n

Bunker fuel may offset lower base rates<\/h2>\n

A shortage of marine fuel is emerging as a further risk. Refinery disruption in Russia and the Middle East has reduced fuel-oil availability, while refiners are directing more capacity toward higher-margin diesel and gasoline. Stocks at Singapore, Fujairah and the Amsterdam\u2013Rotterdam\u2013Antwerp hub have fallen below normal seasonal levels.<\/p>\n

Higher bunker prices can reach wood transactions through fuel adjustment factors even when the base container rate is falling. Because freight represents a substantial part of the landed cost on many forest-products shipments, a reduction in the base rate can be partly or entirely cancelled by revised bunker, security and congestion surcharges.<\/p>\n

A headline index movement is therefore a weak basis for extending freight validity. The rate needs to be checked against the carrier\u2019s surcharge structure, proposed route and bunker-adjustment date. Where possible, the product price and ocean freight should be shown separately, with the freight component subject to reconfirmation before shipment.<\/p>\n

Contract terms now decide the final margin<\/h2>\n

During September, freight cannot be fixed uniformly across destinations or carried unchanged from one quotation to the next. Offers into the Gulf increasingly require shorter validity, explicit port-substitution provisions and a clear allocation of inland costs if discharge is shifted to Fujairah, Sohar or Duqm.<\/p>\n

On Asia\u2013Europe business, lower spot rates create room for a reduction in landed costs only where the booked service is genuinely returning through Suez and not retaining Cape routing as an operational option. The comparison needs to include transit time, free days, transshipment points and the cost of financing inventory during the voyage rather than the ocean rate alone.<\/p>\n

Black Sea cargoes require a separate calculation covering insurance availability, vessel acceptance, laycan risk and the probability of a missed loading window. The lowest fixture is not necessarily the lowest delivered cost if the vessel is later refused, delayed or replaced.<\/p>\n

The immediate advantage belongs to sellers able to quote through several ports, buyers with contracted destination storage and companies capable of switching between container and breakbulk without reopening the underlying product contract. Freight is once again part of the wood price itself, not a stable charge that can be added after the commercial terms have already been agreed.<\/p>\n<\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Ocean freight has stopped moving as a single market for lumber, panels and pulp. Shanghai\u2013Rotterdam rates fell in early September as carriers cautiously restored Suez capacity, while Gulf deliveries became more difficult after traffic through Hormuz returned to its lowest … Continue reading →<\/span><\/a><\/p>","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":99856,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"Default","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[5204],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-99855","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-daily-news"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\nThree shipping crises redraw global wood trade routes - Timber Industry News<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/ro\/three-shipping-crises-redraw-global-wood-trade-routes\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ro_RO\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Three shipping crises redraw global wood trade routes - Timber Industry News\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Ocean freight has stopped moving as a single market for lumber, panels and pulp. Shanghai\u2013Rotterdam rates fell in early September as carriers cautiously restored Suez capacity, while Gulf deliveries became more difficult after traffic through Hormuz returned to its lowest … Continue reading →\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/ro\/three-shipping-crises-redraw-global-wood-trade-routes\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Timber Industry News\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-09-07T04:48:41+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-09-07T16:39:55+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/three-shipping-crises-redraw-global-wood-trade-routes.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1000\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"664\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"GWMI Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Scris de\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"GWMI Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Timp estimat pentru citire\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"10 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/three-shipping-crises-redraw-global-wood-trade-routes\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/three-shipping-crises-redraw-global-wood-trade-routes\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"GWMI Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/#\/schema\/person\/135a1ae8119d1d1755135add5b7287ff\"},\"headline\":\"Three shipping crises redraw global wood trade routes\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-09-07T04:48:41+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-09-07T16:39:55+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/three-shipping-crises-redraw-global-wood-trade-routes\/\"},\"wordCount\":2028,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/three-shipping-crises-redraw-global-wood-trade-routes\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/three-shipping-crises-redraw-global-wood-trade-routes.jpg\",\"articleSection\":[\"Daily News\"],\"inLanguage\":\"ro-RO\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/three-shipping-crises-redraw-global-wood-trade-routes\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/three-shipping-crises-redraw-global-wood-trade-routes\/\",\"name\":\"Three shipping crises redraw global wood trade routes - Timber Industry News\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/three-shipping-crises-redraw-global-wood-trade-routes\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/three-shipping-crises-redraw-global-wood-trade-routes\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/three-shipping-crises-redraw-global-wood-trade-routes.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-09-07T04:48:41+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-09-07T16:39:55+00:00\",\"inLanguage\":\"ro-RO\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/three-shipping-crises-redraw-global-wood-trade-routes\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ro-RO\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/three-shipping-crises-redraw-global-wood-trade-routes\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/three-shipping-crises-redraw-global-wood-trade-routes.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/three-shipping-crises-redraw-global-wood-trade-routes.jpg\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":664,\"caption\":\"Three shipping crises redraw global wood trade routes\"},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/\",\"name\":\"Timber Industry News\",\"description\":\"\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"ro-RO\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Timber Industry News\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ro-RO\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/logo_color.svg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/logo_color.svg\",\"width\":150,\"height\":57,\"caption\":\"Timber Industry News\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/#\/schema\/person\/135a1ae8119d1d1755135add5b7287ff\",\"name\":\"GWMI Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ro-RO\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/7e3f366983e368f37c12ad29c07423641931b311f2561bc3cb4b4eaf6f44c3cb?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/7e3f366983e368f37c12ad29c07423641931b311f2561bc3cb4b4eaf6f44c3cb?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"GWMI Admin\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Three shipping crises redraw global wood trade routes - Timber Industry News","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/ro\/three-shipping-crises-redraw-global-wood-trade-routes\/","og_locale":"ro_RO","og_type":"article","og_title":"Three shipping crises redraw global wood trade routes - Timber Industry News","og_description":"Ocean freight has stopped moving as a single market for lumber, panels and pulp. Shanghai\u2013Rotterdam rates fell in early September as carriers cautiously restored Suez capacity, while Gulf deliveries became more difficult after traffic through Hormuz returned to its lowest … Continue reading →","og_url":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/ro\/three-shipping-crises-redraw-global-wood-trade-routes\/","og_site_name":"Timber Industry News","article_published_time":"2026-09-07T04:48:41+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-09-07T16:39:55+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1000,"height":664,"url":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/three-shipping-crises-redraw-global-wood-trade-routes.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"GWMI Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Scris de":"GWMI Admin","Timp estimat pentru citire":"10 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/three-shipping-crises-redraw-global-wood-trade-routes\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/three-shipping-crises-redraw-global-wood-trade-routes\/"},"author":{"name":"GWMI Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/#\/schema\/person\/135a1ae8119d1d1755135add5b7287ff"},"headline":"Three shipping crises redraw global wood trade routes","datePublished":"2026-09-07T04:48:41+00:00","dateModified":"2026-09-07T16:39:55+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/three-shipping-crises-redraw-global-wood-trade-routes\/"},"wordCount":2028,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/three-shipping-crises-redraw-global-wood-trade-routes\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/three-shipping-crises-redraw-global-wood-trade-routes.jpg","articleSection":["Daily News"],"inLanguage":"ro-RO"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/three-shipping-crises-redraw-global-wood-trade-routes\/","url":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/three-shipping-crises-redraw-global-wood-trade-routes\/","name":"Three shipping crises redraw global wood trade routes - Timber Industry News","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/three-shipping-crises-redraw-global-wood-trade-routes\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/three-shipping-crises-redraw-global-wood-trade-routes\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/three-shipping-crises-redraw-global-wood-trade-routes.jpg","datePublished":"2026-09-07T04:48:41+00:00","dateModified":"2026-09-07T16:39:55+00:00","inLanguage":"ro-RO","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/three-shipping-crises-redraw-global-wood-trade-routes\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ro-RO","@id":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/three-shipping-crises-redraw-global-wood-trade-routes\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/three-shipping-crises-redraw-global-wood-trade-routes.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/three-shipping-crises-redraw-global-wood-trade-routes.jpg","width":1000,"height":664,"caption":"Three shipping crises redraw global wood trade routes"},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/","name":"\u0218tiri din industria lemnului","description":"","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"ro-RO"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/#organization","name":"\u0218tiri din industria lemnului","url":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ro-RO","@id":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/logo_color.svg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/logo_color.svg","width":150,"height":57,"caption":"Timber Industry News"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/#\/schema\/person\/135a1ae8119d1d1755135add5b7287ff","name":"GWMI Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ro-RO","@id":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/7e3f366983e368f37c12ad29c07423641931b311f2561bc3cb4b4eaf6f44c3cb?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/7e3f366983e368f37c12ad29c07423641931b311f2561bc3cb4b4eaf6f44c3cb?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"GWMI Admin"}}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/99855","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=99855"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/99855\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":99857,"href":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/99855\/revisions\/99857"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/99856"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=99855"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=99855"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=99855"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}