{"id":88076,"date":"2024-09-18T09:10:33","date_gmt":"2024-09-18T09:10:33","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/tin.happy-projects.ro\/misled-in-the-deal-pfeifer-demands-e60-million-refund-for-polkky-acquisition\/"},"modified":"2025-09-18T17:28:56","modified_gmt":"2025-09-18T17:28:56","slug":"misled-in-the-deal-pfeifer-demands-e60-million-refund-for-polkky-acquisition","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/ro\/misled-in-the-deal-pfeifer-demands-e60-million-refund-for-polkky-acquisition\/","title":{"rendered":"Misled in the deal: Pfeifer demands \u20ac60 million refund for P\u00f6lkky acquisition"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>A significant dispute has emerged following the sale of the Finnish sawmill company P\u00f6lkky Oy, based in Kuusamo, to Austria\u2019s Pfeifer Holding GmbH. The sale, which was completed in January 2023, has since led to legal battles over the terms of the acquisition and claims of financial misrepresentation.<span id=\"more-36285\"><\/span><\/p>\n<p><strong>Background of the acquisition<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>P\u00f6lkky Oy, one of Finland\u2019s leading sawmill companies, was sold by the Virranniemi family to Austrian-based Pfeifer Holding in a deal finalized on January 31, 2023. The purchase was initially seen as a major step for Pfeifer\u2019s expansion into the Finnish market, with P\u00f6lkky\u2019s assets, including sawmills in Kuusamo, Kajaani, and Taivalkoski, being valuable due to their access to abundant timber resources in the region.<\/p>\n<p>However, shortly after the acquisition, Pfeifer claimed that it had overpaid for P\u00f6lkky due to incomplete and inaccurate information about the company's investment costs. Specifically, Pfeifer stated that the real costs of modernizing the Kajaani and Taivalkoski sawmills had not been fully disclosed during the negotiation process.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Legal dispute over costs<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>According to Pfeifer, the company was surprised to discover that the Kajaani sawmill required an unexpected investment of nearly \u20ac100 million. Pfeifer CEO Josef Dringel stated that this substantial financial burden was not anticipated during the acquisition discussions, leading Pfeifer to believe that they had been misled regarding the company's actual financial status. Pfeifer is now seeking a reduction in the purchase price or damages from the Virranniemi family.<\/p>\n<p>The Virranniemi family, who owned P\u00f6lkky prior to the sale, have denied these allegations, asserting that all relevant financial information was provided during the negotiations.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Court rulings and asset seizures<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The legal battle has now escalated to Finland\u2019s courts. The Rovaniemi Court of Appeal has issued multiple rulings related to the case. In one decision, the court ordered the seizure of more than \u20ac60 million worth of assets belonging to Jaakko, Laura, Pekka, Tuomas, and Petteri Virranniemi. This decision was in response to claims from Pfeifer that the family had provided misleading financial information.<\/p>\n<p>In a separate but related decision, P\u00f6lkky Oy also sought to freeze assets belonging to former CEO Petteri Virranniemi, claiming that he had acted negligently or even intentionally caused financial harm to the company. P\u00f6lkky is seeking over \u20ac2.7 million in damages, accusing Virranniemi of authorizing unnecessary services from a third-party company, which allegedly harmed the business.<\/p>\n<p>Virranniemi has defended his actions, insisting that he acted in P\u00f6lkky\u2019s best interests and that the final costs of the Kajaani sawmill were not fully known at the time of the sale. He has denied all allegations of wrongdoing.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Financial performance and impact<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>P\u00f6lkky\u2019s financial situation has been a central point of contention in the ongoing dispute. Despite the company posting profits of \u20ac22 million and \u20ac27 million in 2021 and 2022 respectively, it reported a loss of \u20ac37.5 million in 2023. The primary source of financial strain has been the modernization of the Kajaani sawmill, which saw its annual production capacity more than double from 200,000 cubic meters to 450,000 cubic meters.<\/p>\n<p><strong>The road ahead<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The dispute is still unfolding, with Pfeifer pursuing further legal remedies. The case is now under arbitration, and it remains unclear how the courts will rule on the claims of misrepresentation and damages.<\/p>\n<p>For Pfeifer, despite the ongoing legal issues, the acquisition of P\u00f6lkky represents a significant strategic investment in the Finnish timber industry, which offers high-quality raw materials and sustainable forest management. However, the financial burden and legal challenges associated with the Kajaani sawmill modernization have cast a shadow over the deal, raising questions about the long-term profitability of the acquisition.<\/p>\n<p>The legal battle between Pfeifer and the Virranniemi family will likely continue as both parties seek to resolve the complex financial and legal issues surrounding the sale of one of Finland's largest sawmill companies.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A significant dispute has emerged following the sale of the Finnish sawmill company P\u00f6lkky Oy, based in Kuusamo, to Austria\u2019s Pfeifer Holding GmbH. The sale, which was completed in January 2023, has since led to legal battles over the terms &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/ro\/misled-in-the-deal-pfeifer-demands-e60-million-refund-for-polkky-acquisition\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":84880,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[4716],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-88076","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-latest-trends","topic-forestry","topic-lumber","topic-sawmilling","topic-wood-products","area-europe","area-global"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v25.9 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Misled in the deal: Pfeifer demands \u20ac60 million refund for P\u00f6lkky acquisition - Timber Industry News<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/ro\/misled-in-the-deal-pfeifer-demands-e60-million-refund-for-polkky-acquisition\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ro_RO\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Misled in the deal: Pfeifer demands \u20ac60 million refund for P\u00f6lkky acquisition - Timber Industry News\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"A significant dispute has emerged following the sale of the Finnish sawmill company P\u00f6lkky Oy, based in Kuusamo, to Austria\u2019s Pfeifer Holding GmbH. The sale, which was completed in January 2023, has since led to legal battles over the terms &hellip; Continue reading &rarr;\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/ro\/misled-in-the-deal-pfeifer-demands-e60-million-refund-for-polkky-acquisition\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Timber Industry News\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-09-18T09:10:33+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-09-18T17:28:56+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/pfeifer-5.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"563\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"382\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"GWMI Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Scris de\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"GWMI Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Timp estimat pentru citire\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/misled-in-the-deal-pfeifer-demands-e60-million-refund-for-polkky-acquisition\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/misled-in-the-deal-pfeifer-demands-e60-million-refund-for-polkky-acquisition\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"GWMI Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/#\/schema\/person\/135a1ae8119d1d1755135add5b7287ff\"},\"headline\":\"Misled in the deal: Pfeifer demands \u20ac60 million refund for P\u00f6lkky acquisition\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-09-18T09:10:33+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-09-18T17:28:56+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/misled-in-the-deal-pfeifer-demands-e60-million-refund-for-polkky-acquisition\/\"},\"wordCount\":645,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/misled-in-the-deal-pfeifer-demands-e60-million-refund-for-polkky-acquisition\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/pfeifer-5.jpg\",\"articleSection\":[\"Latest Trends\"],\"inLanguage\":\"ro-RO\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/misled-in-the-deal-pfeifer-demands-e60-million-refund-for-polkky-acquisition\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/misled-in-the-deal-pfeifer-demands-e60-million-refund-for-polkky-acquisition\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/misled-in-the-deal-pfeifer-demands-e60-million-refund-for-polkky-acquisition\/\",\"name\":\"Misled in the deal: Pfeifer demands \u20ac60 million refund for P\u00f6lkky acquisition - Timber Industry News\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/misled-in-the-deal-pfeifer-demands-e60-million-refund-for-polkky-acquisition\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/misled-in-the-deal-pfeifer-demands-e60-million-refund-for-polkky-acquisition\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/pfeifer-5.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-09-18T09:10:33+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-09-18T17:28:56+00:00\",\"inLanguage\":\"ro-RO\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/misled-in-the-deal-pfeifer-demands-e60-million-refund-for-polkky-acquisition\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ro-RO\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/misled-in-the-deal-pfeifer-demands-e60-million-refund-for-polkky-acquisition\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/pfeifer-5.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/pfeifer-5.jpg\",\"width\":563,\"height\":382},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/\",\"name\":\"Timber Industry News\",\"description\":\"\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"ro-RO\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Timber Industry News\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ro-RO\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/logo_color.svg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/logo_color.svg\",\"width\":150,\"height\":57,\"caption\":\"Timber Industry News\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/#\/schema\/person\/135a1ae8119d1d1755135add5b7287ff\",\"name\":\"GWMI Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ro-RO\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/7e3f366983e368f37c12ad29c07423641931b311f2561bc3cb4b4eaf6f44c3cb?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/7e3f366983e368f37c12ad29c07423641931b311f2561bc3cb4b4eaf6f44c3cb?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"GWMI Admin\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Misled in the deal: Pfeifer demands \u20ac60 million refund for P\u00f6lkky acquisition - Timber Industry News","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/ro\/misled-in-the-deal-pfeifer-demands-e60-million-refund-for-polkky-acquisition\/","og_locale":"ro_RO","og_type":"article","og_title":"Misled in the deal: Pfeifer demands \u20ac60 million refund for P\u00f6lkky acquisition - Timber Industry News","og_description":"A significant dispute has emerged following the sale of the Finnish sawmill company P\u00f6lkky Oy, based in Kuusamo, to Austria\u2019s Pfeifer Holding GmbH. The sale, which was completed in January 2023, has since led to legal battles over the terms &hellip; Continue reading &rarr;","og_url":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/ro\/misled-in-the-deal-pfeifer-demands-e60-million-refund-for-polkky-acquisition\/","og_site_name":"Timber Industry News","article_published_time":"2024-09-18T09:10:33+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-09-18T17:28:56+00:00","og_image":[{"width":563,"height":382,"url":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/pfeifer-5.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"GWMI Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Scris de":"GWMI Admin","Timp estimat pentru citire":"3 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/misled-in-the-deal-pfeifer-demands-e60-million-refund-for-polkky-acquisition\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/misled-in-the-deal-pfeifer-demands-e60-million-refund-for-polkky-acquisition\/"},"author":{"name":"GWMI Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/#\/schema\/person\/135a1ae8119d1d1755135add5b7287ff"},"headline":"Misled in the deal: Pfeifer demands \u20ac60 million refund for P\u00f6lkky acquisition","datePublished":"2024-09-18T09:10:33+00:00","dateModified":"2025-09-18T17:28:56+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/misled-in-the-deal-pfeifer-demands-e60-million-refund-for-polkky-acquisition\/"},"wordCount":645,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/misled-in-the-deal-pfeifer-demands-e60-million-refund-for-polkky-acquisition\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/pfeifer-5.jpg","articleSection":["Latest Trends"],"inLanguage":"ro-RO","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/misled-in-the-deal-pfeifer-demands-e60-million-refund-for-polkky-acquisition\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/misled-in-the-deal-pfeifer-demands-e60-million-refund-for-polkky-acquisition\/","url":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/misled-in-the-deal-pfeifer-demands-e60-million-refund-for-polkky-acquisition\/","name":"Misled in the deal: Pfeifer demands \u20ac60 million refund for P\u00f6lkky acquisition - Timber Industry News","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/misled-in-the-deal-pfeifer-demands-e60-million-refund-for-polkky-acquisition\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/misled-in-the-deal-pfeifer-demands-e60-million-refund-for-polkky-acquisition\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/pfeifer-5.jpg","datePublished":"2024-09-18T09:10:33+00:00","dateModified":"2025-09-18T17:28:56+00:00","inLanguage":"ro-RO","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/misled-in-the-deal-pfeifer-demands-e60-million-refund-for-polkky-acquisition\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ro-RO","@id":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/misled-in-the-deal-pfeifer-demands-e60-million-refund-for-polkky-acquisition\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/pfeifer-5.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/pfeifer-5.jpg","width":563,"height":382},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/","name":"\u0218tiri din industria lemnului","description":"","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"ro-RO"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/#organization","name":"\u0218tiri din industria lemnului","url":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ro-RO","@id":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/logo_color.svg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/logo_color.svg","width":150,"height":57,"caption":"Timber Industry News"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/#\/schema\/person\/135a1ae8119d1d1755135add5b7287ff","name":"GWMI Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ro-RO","@id":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/7e3f366983e368f37c12ad29c07423641931b311f2561bc3cb4b4eaf6f44c3cb?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/7e3f366983e368f37c12ad29c07423641931b311f2561bc3cb4b4eaf6f44c3cb?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"GWMI Admin"}}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/88076","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=88076"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/88076\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/84880"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=88076"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=88076"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=88076"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}