{"id":100576,"date":"2026-11-10T08:11:15","date_gmt":"2026-11-10T08:11:15","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/?p=100576"},"modified":"2026-11-10T22:09:48","modified_gmt":"2026-11-10T22:09:48","slug":"europe-and-north-americas-largest-sawmills-struggle-to-rebuild-margins","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/ro\/europe-and-north-americas-largest-sawmills-struggle-to-rebuild-margins\/","title":{"rendered":"Europe and North America\u2019s largest sawmills struggle to rebuild margins"},"content":{"rendered":"<p data-pm-slice=\"1 1 []\">Selling lumber at a higher price is offering sawmills less relief than they need. Expensive logs, freight bills and manufacturing costs continue to absorb much of the additional revenue, while uncertain orders complicate production schedules. Across Europe and North America, producers are deciding which mills to keep running, where to reduce output and how long to wait for better returns before taking capacity out of the market.<!--more--><\/p>\n<p>North America\u2019s largest listed lumber producers recovered substantial earnings from a weak 2025 comparison, but all four reported lower adjusted lumber or company EBITDA in the third quarter than in the preceding three months. Higher selling prices were insufficient to offset the combined effects of production costs, transport expenses, downtime and changes in the products sold.<\/p>\n<p>European results were more divided. SCA increased its wood earnings from the second quarter as raw-material costs declined. Holmen reduced its operating loss despite lower deliveries. S\u00f6dra\u2019s sawmills remained deeply unprofitable, with expensive logs, weaker prices and reduced volumes pushing losses further above the previous year\u2019s level.<\/p>\n<p>Third-quarter reports released between 22 October and 5 November provide the basis for GWMI\u2019s comparison of Weyerhaeuser, West Fraser, Canfor, Interfor, SCA, Holmen, S\u00f6dra, Mets\u00e4 Fibre and Stora Enso. The analysis concentrates on lumber deliveries, selling prices and earnings from the relevant businesses. Canfor\u2019s figures include its European operations.<\/p>\n<div style=\"margin: 26px 0; background: #fff; color: #18374b; font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;\">\n<div style=\"width: 52px; height: 5px; background: #d9232e; margin: 0 0 14px;\"><\/div>\n<p style=\"margin: 0 0 6px; font-size: 21px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 1.25;\">Sawmill deliveries and selling prices<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin: 0 0 14px; font-size: 13px; color: #596873;\">Q3 2026 \u00b7 volumes in 1,000 m\u00b3 \u00b7 year-on-year volume change<\/p>\n<div style=\"width: 100%; overflow-x: auto; -webkit-overflow-scrolling: touch;\">\n<table style=\"width: 100%; min-width: 650px; border-collapse: collapse; table-layout: auto; margin: 0; font-size: 14px; line-height: 1.4;\">\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th style=\"border: 1px solid #18374b; padding: 11px 12px; background: #18374b; color: #fff; text-align: left;\">Company \/ business<\/th>\n<th style=\"border: 1px solid #18374b; padding: 11px 12px; background: #18374b; color: #fff; text-align: right;\">Deliveries<\/th>\n<th style=\"border: 1px solid #18374b; padding: 11px 12px; background: #18374b; color: #fff; text-align: right;\">YoY<\/th>\n<th style=\"border: 1px solid #18374b; padding: 11px 12px; background: #18374b; color: #fff; text-align: left;\">Selling-price performance<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"border: 1px solid #c9d2d8; padding: 10px 12px; background: #fff; color: #18374b; vertical-align: top;\"><strong>Canfor<\/strong><br \/>\n<span style=\"font-size: 11px;\">Lumber; includes Europe<\/span><\/td>\n<td style=\"border: 1px solid #c9d2d8; padding: 10px 12px; background: #fff; color: #18374b; text-align: right; vertical-align: top;\">3,030<\/td>\n<td style=\"border: 1px solid #c9d2d8; padding: 10px 12px; background: #fff; color: #18374b; text-align: right; vertical-align: top;\">+5.3%<\/td>\n<td style=\"border: 1px solid #c9d2d8; padding: 10px 12px; background: #fff; color: #18374b; vertical-align: top;\">Higher in all operating regions, quarter on quarter<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"border: 1px solid #c9d2d8; padding: 10px 12px; background: #f4f6f7; color: #18374b; vertical-align: top;\"><strong>West Fraser<\/strong><br \/>\n<span style=\"font-size: 11px;\">SPF and southern yellow pine<\/span><\/td>\n<td style=\"border: 1px solid #c9d2d8; padding: 10px 12px; background: #f4f6f7; color: #18374b; text-align: right; vertical-align: top;\">2,978<\/td>\n<td style=\"border: 1px solid #c9d2d8; padding: 10px 12px; background: #f4f6f7; color: #18374b; text-align: right; vertical-align: top;\">\u22123.1%<\/td>\n<td style=\"border: 1px solid #c9d2d8; padding: 10px 12px; background: #f4f6f7; color: #18374b; vertical-align: top;\">SPF higher; southern yellow pine lower, quarter on quarter<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"border: 1px solid #c9d2d8; padding: 10px 12px; background: #fff; color: #18374b; vertical-align: top;\"><strong>Weyerhaeuser<\/strong><br \/>\n<span style=\"font-size: 11px;\">Third-party structural lumber sales<\/span><\/td>\n<td style=\"border: 1px solid #c9d2d8; padding: 10px 12px; background: #fff; color: #18374b; text-align: right; vertical-align: top;\">2,910<\/td>\n<td style=\"border: 1px solid #c9d2d8; padding: 10px 12px; background: #fff; color: #18374b; text-align: right; vertical-align: top;\">\u22122.1%<\/td>\n<td style=\"border: 1px solid #c9d2d8; padding: 10px 12px; background: #fff; color: #18374b; vertical-align: top;\">US$216\/m\u00b3 (\u20ac193); +25.9% year on year\u00b9<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"border: 1px solid #c9d2d8; padding: 10px 12px; background: #f4f6f7; color: #18374b; vertical-align: top;\"><strong>Interfor<\/strong><br \/>\n<span style=\"font-size: 11px;\">Lumber sales<\/span><\/td>\n<td style=\"border: 1px solid #c9d2d8; padding: 10px 12px; background: #f4f6f7; color: #18374b; text-align: right; vertical-align: top;\">2,237<\/td>\n<td style=\"border: 1px solid #c9d2d8; padding: 10px 12px; background: #f4f6f7; color: #18374b; text-align: right; vertical-align: top;\">+2.6%<\/td>\n<td style=\"border: 1px solid #c9d2d8; padding: 10px 12px; background: #f4f6f7; color: #18374b; vertical-align: top;\">C$318\/m\u00b3 (\u20ac202); +21.5% year on year\u00b2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"border: 1px solid #c9d2d8; padding: 10px 12px; background: #fff; color: #18374b; vertical-align: top;\"><strong>Stora Enso<\/strong><br \/>\n<span style=\"font-size: 11px;\">External wood products deliveries<\/span><\/td>\n<td style=\"border: 1px solid #c9d2d8; padding: 10px 12px; background: #fff; color: #18374b; text-align: right; vertical-align: top;\">1,042<\/td>\n<td style=\"border: 1px solid #c9d2d8; padding: 10px 12px; background: #fff; color: #18374b; text-align: right; vertical-align: top;\">+0.3%<\/td>\n<td style=\"border: 1px solid #c9d2d8; padding: 10px 12px; background: #fff; color: #18374b; vertical-align: top;\">No blended selling price disclosed<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"border: 1px solid #c9d2d8; padding: 10px 12px; background: #f4f6f7; color: #18374b; vertical-align: top;\"><strong>SCA<\/strong><br \/>\n<span style=\"font-size: 11px;\">Solid wood products<\/span><\/td>\n<td style=\"border: 1px solid #c9d2d8; padding: 10px 12px; background: #f4f6f7; color: #18374b; text-align: right; vertical-align: top;\">489<\/td>\n<td style=\"border: 1px solid #c9d2d8; padding: 10px 12px; background: #f4f6f7; color: #18374b; text-align: right; vertical-align: top;\">\u22128.1%<\/td>\n<td style=\"border: 1px solid #c9d2d8; padding: 10px 12px; background: #f4f6f7; color: #18374b; vertical-align: top;\">Slightly lower quarter on quarter; slightly higher year on year<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"border: 1px solid #c9d2d8; padding: 10px 12px; background: #fff; color: #18374b; vertical-align: top;\"><strong>S\u00f6dra<\/strong><br \/>\n<span style=\"font-size: 11px;\">Sawn timber<\/span><\/td>\n<td style=\"border: 1px solid #c9d2d8; padding: 10px 12px; background: #fff; color: #18374b; text-align: right; vertical-align: top;\">385<\/td>\n<td style=\"border: 1px solid #c9d2d8; padding: 10px 12px; background: #fff; color: #18374b; text-align: right; vertical-align: top;\">\u22127.9%<\/td>\n<td style=\"border: 1px solid #c9d2d8; padding: 10px 12px; background: #fff; color: #18374b; vertical-align: top;\">Market prices slightly lower year on year<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"border: 1px solid #c9d2d8; padding: 10px 12px; background: #f4f6f7; color: #18374b; vertical-align: top;\"><strong>Mets\u00e4 Fibre<\/strong><br \/>\n<span style=\"font-size: 11px;\">Sawn timber<\/span><\/td>\n<td style=\"border: 1px solid #c9d2d8; padding: 10px 12px; background: #f4f6f7; color: #18374b; text-align: right; vertical-align: top;\">364<\/td>\n<td style=\"border: 1px solid #c9d2d8; padding: 10px 12px; background: #f4f6f7; color: #18374b; text-align: right; vertical-align: top;\">+0.8%<\/td>\n<td style=\"border: 1px solid #c9d2d8; padding: 10px 12px; background: #f4f6f7; color: #18374b; vertical-align: top;\">Reported market prices unchanged quarter on quarter<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"border: 1px solid #c9d2d8; padding: 10px 12px; background: #fff; color: #18374b; vertical-align: top;\"><strong>Holmen<\/strong><br \/>\n<span style=\"font-size: 11px;\">Produse din lemn<\/span><\/td>\n<td style=\"border: 1px solid #c9d2d8; padding: 10px 12px; background: #fff; color: #18374b; text-align: right; vertical-align: top;\">269<\/td>\n<td style=\"border: 1px solid #c9d2d8; padding: 10px 12px; background: #fff; color: #18374b; text-align: right; vertical-align: top;\">\u221215.4%<\/td>\n<td style=\"border: 1px solid #c9d2d8; padding: 10px 12px; background: #fff; color: #18374b; vertical-align: top;\">Unchanged quarter on quarter<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<p style=\"margin: 10px 0 0; font-size: 11px; line-height: 1.5; color: #596873;\">North American volumes and prices use a nominal conversion of 1,000 board feet = 2.3597 m\u00b3. \u00b9 Delivered sales realization. \u00b2 Gross selling price including duties, tariffs and freight. Product mixes differ. Stora Enso\u2019s +0.3% is its reported change before rounding. Euro equivalents use ECB rates of 9 November 2026.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.globalwoodmarketsinfo.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/11\/sawmill.png\"><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p><strong>North American earnings improve annually but weaken sequentially<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The annual recovery was substantial. Weyerhaeuser\u2019s lumber adjusted EBITDA reached US$69 million (\u20ac61.6 million), against a US$48 million loss a year earlier. West Fraser\u2019s lumber business generated US$34 million (\u20ac30.4 million), compared with a US$123 million loss. Canfor\u2019s lumber adjusted EBITDA rose to C$107.9 million (\u20ac68.4 million), from a C$2 million loss, while Interfor returned to positive adjusted EBITDA of C$76.9 million (\u20ac48.7 million).<\/p>\n<p>The comparison with the second quarter was considerably weaker. Canfor\u2019s lumber adjusted EBITDA fell approximately 25%, West Fraser\u2019s declined 17%, Interfor\u2019s dropped 17% and Weyerhaeuser\u2019s lumber earnings decreased about 5%.<\/p>\n<p>Some of the annual improvement also came from changes in duty-related charges. Interfor\u2019s previous-year result contained a large non-cash expense, while West Fraser\u2019s latest quarter benefited from a favorable adjustment. The improvement in lumber trading was therefore smaller than the headline earnings swing at those companies.<\/p>\n<p>Shipments offered little evidence of a broad acceleration. Canfor and Interfor sold more lumber than a year earlier, while Weyerhaeuser and West Fraser sold less. Against the second quarter, volumes increased at Weyerhaeuser and Interfor but declined at Canfor and West Fraser.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Weyerhaeuser ships more, but freight and costs absorb the gain<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Weyerhaeuser\u2019s third-party structural lumber sales reached approximately 2.91 million m\u00b3, up 6.0% from the second quarter but down 2.1% year on year. Its average delivered realization was equivalent to US$216\/m\u00b3 (\u20ac193), 25.9% above the corresponding 2025 level.<\/p>\n<p>Lumber adjusted EBITDA nevertheless declined from US$73 million in the second quarter to US$69 million. Delivered realizations edged higher, but the amount retained after freight fell: average net-of-freight realizations decreased from approximately US$192\/m\u00b3 to US$190\/m\u00b3. Log and manufacturing costs also increased slightly.<\/p>\n<p>The company sold a larger volume sequentially without improving the return generated by those sales. Higher transport charges supported the delivered price paid by customers, while leaving less revenue available to cover production costs.<\/p>\n<p>For lumber exporters and buyers comparing supplier quotations, the freight basis remains essential. A delivered price includes services and costs beyond the mill gate. An increase caused by transport charges does not give a sawmill the same earnings benefit as an equivalent increase in the underlying lumber price.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.globalwoodmarketsinfo.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/11\/weyer.png\"><\/a><\/p>\n<p><strong>Interfor\u2019s higher prices fail to prevent a quarterly earnings decline<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Interfor sold approximately 2.24 million m\u00b3 of lumber, up 2.6% year on year and 0.7% from the second quarter. Its average gross selling price reached the equivalent of C$318\/m\u00b3 (\u20ac202), an increase of 21.5% annually and 1.6% sequentially.<\/p>\n<p>Adjusted EBITDA fell from C$92.3 million to C$76.9 million, while the reported margin narrowed from 11.5% to 9.2%. Both sales volumes and average prices improved from the preceding quarter, but earnings declined.<\/p>\n<p>Interfor\u2019s price measure includes duties, tariffs and freight. It should therefore be compared with the company\u2019s own historical series rather than treated as an ex-mill quotation.<\/p>\n<p>The annual earnings comparison was also affected by the C$156.7 million non-cash duty charge included in the third quarter of 2025. That charge accounted for a large part of the C$183.8 million adjusted EBITDA loss reported for the period.<\/p>\n<p>The sequential result gives a less favorable account of recent trading than the annual recovery. Interfor entered the third quarter with positive earnings, achieved modest gains in volumes and gross prices, and still finished with a smaller margin.<\/p>\n<p><strong>West Fraser faces different markets for SPF and southern yellow pine<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>West Fraser\u2019s lumber shipments totaled approximately 2.98 million m\u00b3, down 3.1% year on year and 2.0% from the second quarter. Lumber adjusted EBITDA declined sequentially from US$41 million to US$34 million (\u20ac30.4 million).<\/p>\n<p>The latest result included a favorable US$12 million duty adjustment. The lumber segment recorded an operating loss of US$17 million after depreciation and other operating charges.<\/p>\n<p>Prices moved in different directions across the portfolio. Spruce-pine-fir realizations improved from the second quarter, while southern yellow pine realizations weakened. A stronger market for one product group was insufficient to offset the weaker performance elsewhere.<\/p>\n<p>Costs remained a further constraint. West Fraser estimated that diesel inflation since the beginning of the year had added approximately US$6.4\/m\u00b3 to lumber costs. Customer freight surcharges recovered part of the increased transport expense, but did not remove the pressure on production and logistics.<\/p>\n<p>Species, product dimensions and mill location can produce very different financial results within the same company. A consolidated lumber price conceals those differences, particularly when demand and inventories develop unevenly across regional markets.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Canfor\u2019s European growth includes acquired capacity<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Canfor shipped approximately 3.03 million m\u00b3 of lumber, up 5.3% year on year but down 5.0% from the second quarter. Lumber adjusted EBITDA fell from C$144.7 million to C$107.9 million (\u20ac68.4 million), despite improved realizations across its operating regions.<\/p>\n<p>Lower European shipments and seasonal production downtime reduced earnings. European deliveries reached approximately 944,000 m\u00b3, down from the second quarter but 13.6% above the year-earlier level.<\/p>\n<p>The annual volume increase primarily came from the contribution of the acquired Hedin mills. European adjusted EBITDA was C$19.8 million (\u20ac12.5 million), compared with C$36.9 million in the second quarter.<\/p>\n<p>Canfor also achieved better realizations for certain wider lumber dimensions even where standard southern yellow pine benchmarks declined. Its actual sales mix provided some protection against weaker benchmark prices.<\/p>\n<p>Acquired mills increase a company\u2019s reported deliveries without necessarily increasing market consumption. Canfor\u2019s European shipment growth therefore cannot be read as a comparable increase in customer demand. The business operated a larger portfolio than a year earlier, while still experiencing the seasonal reduction in activity during the third quarter.<\/p>\n<p>For suppliers assessing competition, the acquired capacity remains commercially relevant: it changes the scale and reach of the company selling the lumber. For an assessment of demand, however, the additional volumes need to be separated from growth within the existing mill network.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Cheaper logs help SCA recover part of its margin<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>SCA delivered 489,000 m\u00b3 of solid wood products, down 8.1% from a year earlier. Wood EBITDA fell from SEK232 million to SEK117 million (\u20ac10.6 million), as higher raw-material and distribution costs, together with lower deliveries, outweighed slightly higher annual selling prices.<\/p>\n<p>Against the second quarter, EBITDA increased by 31% from SEK89 million. Lower raw-material costs drove the improvement, while selling prices declined slightly. The Wood EBITDA margin recovered to 8.1%, although it remained well below the 15.0% recorded a year earlier.<\/p>\n<p>The sequential price decline partly resulted from a greater proportion of lower-quality, wind-felled timber in the sales mix. SCA also reported stronger demand for spruce than pine, with producer inventories high for pine and normal for spruce.<\/p>\n<p>The earnings improvement came through procurement costs rather than stronger selling prices. SCA retained more of its revenue because raw materials became less expensive, despite selling a smaller volume than in the preceding quarter.<\/p>\n<p>The difference between spruce and pine also limits the usefulness of a single European softwood price. Mills selling into a better-balanced spruce market can face different order conditions from those competing to move pine from higher inventories. Quality and specifications further affect the price a producer can achieve.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Holmen reduces losses without a selling-price increase<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Holmen\u2019s Wood Products deliveries declined 15.4% year on year to 269,000 m\u00b3. Deliveries also fell seasonally from the second quarter, while production curtailments constrained volumes.<\/p>\n<p>Selling prices were unchanged sequentially. Lower log costs and production improvements nevertheless reduced the operating loss from SEK55 million to SEK23 million (\u20ac2.1 million). EBITDA returned to a positive SEK29 million (\u20ac2.6 million), compared with negative SEK3 million in the second quarter.<\/p>\n<p>Holmen improved its result while shipping less lumber. Purchasing costs and production performance provided relief that the sales market had not delivered.<\/p>\n<p>The business remained loss-making after depreciation. Positive EBITDA covered only part of the financial requirements of the industrial operation; the mills had yet to generate an operating profit.<\/p>\n<p>For producers carrying large investments in modern sawmills, that gap remains important. Higher efficiency can reduce the cost of processing each cubic metre, but the assets still require maintenance and must earn a return over their operating life. A period of positive EBITDA does not by itself establish that those investments are generating an adequate return.<\/p>\n<p><strong>S\u00f6dra\u2019s sawmill losses deepen<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>S\u00f6dra\u2019s sawn-timber deliveries fell 7.9% year on year to 385,000 m\u00b3. Production declined to 306,000 m\u00b3 from 354,000 m\u00b3, a reduction of approximately 14%.<\/p>\n<p>Lower market prices, higher raw-material costs and reduced deliveries pushed the Wood operating loss to SEK256 million (\u20ac23.3 million), compared with SEK103 million a year earlier. Wood EBITDA was negative SEK187 million (\u20ac17.0 million), against negative SEK39 million in the corresponding period of 2025.<\/p>\n<p>The group\u2019s return to operating profit, supported by a disposal gain, did not extend to the sawmills. Lumber manufacturing continued to lose money despite the improvement in the consolidated result.<\/p>\n<p>S\u00f6dra\u2019s lower output did not prevent the deterioration. Production reductions can limit the amount of lumber entering a weak market, but they do not immediately eliminate the costs of staffing, maintaining and operating an industrial network.<\/p>\n<div style=\"margin: 26px 0; background: #fff; color: #18374b; font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;\">\n<div style=\"width: 52px; height: 5px; background: #d9232e; margin: 0 0 14px;\"><\/div>\n<p style=\"margin: 0 0 6px; font-size: 21px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 1.25;\">The profit recovery varies sharply by producer<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin: 0 0 14px; font-size: 13px; color: #596873;\">Q3 earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization \u00b7 amounts in millions<\/p>\n<div style=\"width: 100%; overflow-x: auto; -webkit-overflow-scrolling: touch;\">\n<table style=\"width: 100%; min-width: 650px; border-collapse: collapse; table-layout: auto; margin: 0; font-size: 14px; line-height: 1.4;\">\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th style=\"border: 1px solid #18374b; padding: 11px 12px; background: #18374b; color: #fff; text-align: left;\">Company \/ measure<\/th>\n<th style=\"border: 1px solid #18374b; padding: 11px 12px; background: #18374b; color: #fff; text-align: right;\">Currency<\/th>\n<th style=\"border: 1px solid #18374b; padding: 11px 12px; background: #18374b; color: #fff; text-align: right;\">Q3 2025<\/th>\n<th style=\"border: 1px solid #18374b; padding: 11px 12px; background: #18374b; color: #fff; text-align: right;\">Q3 2026<\/th>\n<th style=\"border: 1px solid #18374b; padding: 11px 12px; background: #18374b; color: #fff; text-align: right;\">Q3 2026<br \/>\n\u20ac equivalent<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"border: 1px solid #c9d2d8; padding: 10px 12px; background: #fff; color: #18374b; vertical-align: top;\"><strong>Canfor<\/strong><br \/>\n<span style=\"font-size: 11px;\">Lumber \u00b7 adjusted EBITDA<\/span><\/td>\n<td style=\"border: 1px solid #c9d2d8; padding: 10px 12px; background: #fff; color: #18374b; text-align: right;\">C$<\/td>\n<td style=\"border: 1px solid #c9d2d8; padding: 10px 12px; background: #fff; color: #18374b; text-align: right;\">\u22122.0<\/td>\n<td style=\"border: 1px solid #c9d2d8; padding: 10px 12px; background: #fff; color: #18374b; text-align: right;\">107.9<\/td>\n<td style=\"border: 1px solid #c9d2d8; padding: 10px 12px; background: #fff; color: #18374b; text-align: right;\">68.4<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"border: 1px solid #c9d2d8; padding: 10px 12px; background: #f4f6f7; color: #18374b; vertical-align: top;\"><strong>Weyerhaeuser<\/strong><br \/>\n<span style=\"font-size: 11px;\">Lumber \u00b7 adjusted EBITDA<\/span><\/td>\n<td style=\"border: 1px solid #c9d2d8; padding: 10px 12px; background: #f4f6f7; color: #18374b; text-align: right;\">US$<\/td>\n<td style=\"border: 1px solid #c9d2d8; padding: 10px 12px; background: #f4f6f7; color: #18374b; text-align: right;\">\u221248.0<\/td>\n<td style=\"border: 1px solid #c9d2d8; padding: 10px 12px; background: #f4f6f7; color: #18374b; text-align: right;\">69.0<\/td>\n<td style=\"border: 1px solid #c9d2d8; padding: 10px 12px; background: #f4f6f7; color: #18374b; text-align: right;\">61.6<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"border: 1px solid #c9d2d8; padding: 10px 12px; background: #fff; color: #18374b; vertical-align: top;\"><strong>Interfor<\/strong><br \/>\n<span style=\"font-size: 11px;\">Adjusted EBITDA<\/span><\/td>\n<td style=\"border: 1px solid #c9d2d8; padding: 10px 12px; background: #fff; color: #18374b; text-align: right;\">C$<\/td>\n<td style=\"border: 1px solid #c9d2d8; padding: 10px 12px; background: #fff; color: #18374b; text-align: right;\">\u2212183.8<\/td>\n<td style=\"border: 1px solid #c9d2d8; padding: 10px 12px; background: #fff; color: #18374b; text-align: right;\">76.9<\/td>\n<td style=\"border: 1px solid #c9d2d8; padding: 10px 12px; background: #fff; color: #18374b; text-align: right;\">48.7<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"border: 1px solid #c9d2d8; padding: 10px 12px; background: #f4f6f7; color: #18374b; vertical-align: top;\"><strong>West Fraser<\/strong><br \/>\n<span style=\"font-size: 11px;\">Lumber \u00b7 adjusted EBITDA<\/span><\/td>\n<td style=\"border: 1px solid #c9d2d8; padding: 10px 12px; background: #f4f6f7; color: #18374b; text-align: right;\">US$<\/td>\n<td style=\"border: 1px solid #c9d2d8; padding: 10px 12px; background: #f4f6f7; color: #18374b; text-align: right;\">\u2212123.0<\/td>\n<td style=\"border: 1px solid #c9d2d8; padding: 10px 12px; background: #f4f6f7; color: #18374b; text-align: right;\">34.0<\/td>\n<td style=\"border: 1px solid #c9d2d8; padding: 10px 12px; background: #f4f6f7; color: #18374b; text-align: right;\">30.4<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"border: 1px solid #c9d2d8; padding: 10px 12px; background: #fff; color: #18374b; vertical-align: top;\"><strong>SCA<\/strong><br \/>\n<span style=\"font-size: 11px;\">Wood \u00b7 EBITDA<\/span><\/td>\n<td style=\"border: 1px solid #c9d2d8; padding: 10px 12px; background: #fff; color: #18374b; text-align: right;\">SEK<\/td>\n<td style=\"border: 1px solid #c9d2d8; padding: 10px 12px; background: #fff; color: #18374b; text-align: right;\">232.0<\/td>\n<td style=\"border: 1px solid #c9d2d8; padding: 10px 12px; background: #fff; color: #18374b; text-align: right;\">117.0<\/td>\n<td style=\"border: 1px solid #c9d2d8; padding: 10px 12px; background: #fff; color: #18374b; text-align: right;\">10.6<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"border: 1px solid #c9d2d8; padding: 10px 12px; background: #f4f6f7; color: #18374b; vertical-align: top;\"><strong>Holmen<\/strong><br \/>\n<span style=\"font-size: 11px;\">Wood Products \u00b7 EBITDA<\/span><\/td>\n<td style=\"border: 1px solid #c9d2d8; padding: 10px 12px; background: #f4f6f7; color: #18374b; text-align: right;\">SEK<\/td>\n<td style=\"border: 1px solid #c9d2d8; padding: 10px 12px; background: #f4f6f7; color: #18374b; text-align: right;\">\u221236.0<\/td>\n<td style=\"border: 1px solid #c9d2d8; padding: 10px 12px; background: #f4f6f7; color: #18374b; text-align: right;\">29.0<\/td>\n<td style=\"border: 1px solid #c9d2d8; padding: 10px 12px; background: #f4f6f7; color: #18374b; text-align: right;\">2.6<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"border: 1px solid #c9d2d8; padding: 10px 12px; background: #fff; color: #18374b; vertical-align: top;\"><strong>S\u00f6dra<\/strong><br \/>\n<span style=\"font-size: 11px;\">Wood \u00b7 EBITDA<\/span><\/td>\n<td style=\"border: 1px solid #c9d2d8; padding: 10px 12px; background: #fff; color: #18374b; text-align: right;\">SEK<\/td>\n<td style=\"border: 1px solid #c9d2d8; padding: 10px 12px; background: #fff; color: #18374b; text-align: right;\">\u221239.0<\/td>\n<td style=\"border: 1px solid #c9d2d8; padding: 10px 12px; background: #fff; color: #18374b; text-align: right;\">\u2212187.0<\/td>\n<td style=\"border: 1px solid #c9d2d8; padding: 10px 12px; background: #fff; color: #18374b; text-align: right;\">\u221217.0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<p style=\"margin: 10px 0 0; font-size: 11px; line-height: 1.5; color: #596873;\">Company definitions and business scopes differ. Interfor\u2019s Q3 2025 includes a C$156.7m duty charge; West Fraser\u2019s Q3 2026 includes a US$12m favorable duty adjustment. \u20ac1 = US$1.1193 \/ C$1.5785 \/ SEK10.9960, ECB, 9 November 2026; conversions are indicative, not accounting translations.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p>The Swedish results consequently remained far apart. SCA benefited from lower raw-material costs during the quarter. Holmen reduced its loss. S\u00f6dra faced a substantially larger loss than a year earlier. None of those outcomes can be explained by the direction of finished lumber prices alone.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Mets\u00e4 Fibre and Stora Enso hold annual delivery volumes<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Mets\u00e4 Fibre\u2019s sawn-timber deliveries were broadly stable at 364,000 m\u00b3, compared with 361,000 m\u00b3 a year earlier. Reported market prices were unchanged both annually and sequentially.<\/p>\n<p>Stora Enso reported external wood-products deliveries of 1.042 million m\u00b3, a stated increase of 0.3% year on year. Deliveries were below the second quarter\u2019s 1.230 million m\u00b3.<\/p>\n<p>The financial reporting provides less detail on the profitability of those volumes. Mets\u00e4 Fibre combines pulp and sawn timber in its segment results. Stora Enso ceased reporting Wood Products as a separate segment from the beginning of 2026.<\/p>\n<p>Their shipment figures can be included in a comparison of trading activity, but the wider segment and group earnings cannot be assigned to lumber manufacturing. A recovery in pulp or packaging would not establish a corresponding improvement at the sawmills.<\/p>\n<p>The available delivery figures point to stable annual sales volumes at both businesses. They do not provide evidence of a strong expansion in demand or allow a direct comparison of sawmill margins with the separately reported lumber businesses in North America.<\/p>\n<p><strong>October prices weaken the case for a sustained recovery<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Weyerhaeuser\u2019s early fourth-quarter pricing was less favorable than its third-quarter annual comparison. As of 23 October, its quarter-to-date lumber realization net of freight had fallen to approximately US$167\/m\u00b3 (\u20ac149), down 12.2% from the third-quarter average of about US$190\/m\u00b3.<\/p>\n<p>The figure covers only part of the quarter. Even so, the decline was large enough to put renewed pressure on the revenue available to cover logs and conversion costs.<\/p>\n<p>A mill cannot normally reduce those costs as quickly as a lumber price can fall. Existing log inventories, labor requirements, maintenance schedules and transport arrangements restrict the immediate response. Lower realizations can therefore reduce earnings before management has much opportunity to adjust the cost base.<\/p>\n<p>Operating decisions become more difficult when margins are already narrow. Keeping mills running spreads fixed costs across more production, but risks adding inventory if customers reduce purchases. Curtailing output reduces exposure to weak prices while leaving fewer cubic metres over which to recover the remaining costs.<\/p>\n<p>The four North American producers entered this period with better annual earnings than in 2025. Their weaker sequential results leave less room to absorb another reduction in selling prices.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Mill closures continue despite the annual earnings recovery<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>West Fraser announced an indefinite curtailment at its Leola sawmill in Arkansas, removing approximately 531,000 m\u00b3 of annual nominal capacity as production winds down in the fourth quarter. Canfor also reported the closure of its Fox Creek sawmill in Alberta.<\/p>\n<p>Positive earnings across a large lumber portfolio have not secured the future of every mill within it. Companies continue to assess individual operations against regional log costs, production efficiency, freight requirements and the prices available for their output.<\/p>\n<p>Closures can improve the average performance of the remaining portfolio, but they also reduce the production base from which future shipment growth can come. Subsequent improvements in earnings may therefore combine better trading conditions with the removal of weaker operations.<\/p>\n<p>Across the companies reviewed, the strongest annual profit recoveries were concentrated in North America. The more recent quarterly comparisons were weaker. In Sweden, some producers began to benefit from cheaper logs, while others continued to report severe losses.<\/p>\n<p>Further progress will require more than higher invoices or larger shipment totals. Producers need stronger lumber realizations after freight, lower raw-material and conversion costs, or a combination of both. Acquired volumes and duty adjustments can improve reported results without resolving the operating pressure at individual sawmills.<\/p>\n<p>The third quarter brought higher annual earnings for several of the industry\u2019s largest companies. It also brought lower sequential profits, further capacity reductions and an early fourth-quarter decline in prices. The recovery has improved the accounts faster than it has secured the mills.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Selling lumber at a higher price is offering sawmills less relief than they need. Expensive logs, freight bills and manufacturing costs continue to absorb much of the additional revenue, while uncertain orders complicate production schedules. Across Europe and North America, &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/ro\/europe-and-north-americas-largest-sawmills-struggle-to-rebuild-margins\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":100577,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"Default","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[5204],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-100576","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-daily-news"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v28.7 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Europe and North America\u2019s largest sawmills struggle to rebuild margins - Timber Industry News<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/ro\/europe-and-north-americas-largest-sawmills-struggle-to-rebuild-margins\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ro_RO\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Europe and North America\u2019s largest sawmills struggle to rebuild margins - Timber Industry News\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Selling lumber at a higher price is offering sawmills less relief than they need. Expensive logs, freight bills and manufacturing costs continue to absorb much of the additional revenue, while uncertain orders complicate production schedules. Across Europe and North America, &hellip; Continue reading &rarr;\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/ro\/europe-and-north-americas-largest-sawmills-struggle-to-rebuild-margins\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Timber Industry News\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-11-10T08:11:15+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-11-10T22:09:48+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/11\/europe-and-north-americas-largest-sawmills-struggle-to-rebuild-margins.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"768\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"GWMI Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Scris de\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"GWMI Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Timp estimat pentru citire\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"13 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.timberindustrynews.com\\\/europe-and-north-americas-largest-sawmills-struggle-to-rebuild-margins\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.timberindustrynews.com\\\/europe-and-north-americas-largest-sawmills-struggle-to-rebuild-margins\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"GWMI Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.timberindustrynews.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/135a1ae8119d1d1755135add5b7287ff\"},\"headline\":\"Europe and North America\u2019s largest sawmills struggle to rebuild margins\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-11-10T08:11:15+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-11-10T22:09:48+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.timberindustrynews.com\\\/europe-and-north-americas-largest-sawmills-struggle-to-rebuild-margins\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":2615,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.timberindustrynews.com\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.timberindustrynews.com\\\/europe-and-north-americas-largest-sawmills-struggle-to-rebuild-margins\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.timberindustrynews.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/11\\\/europe-and-north-americas-largest-sawmills-struggle-to-rebuild-margins.jpg\",\"articleSection\":[\"Daily News\"],\"inLanguage\":\"ro-RO\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.timberindustrynews.com\\\/europe-and-north-americas-largest-sawmills-struggle-to-rebuild-margins\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.timberindustrynews.com\\\/europe-and-north-americas-largest-sawmills-struggle-to-rebuild-margins\\\/\",\"name\":\"Europe and North America\u2019s largest sawmills struggle to rebuild margins - Timber Industry News\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.timberindustrynews.com\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.timberindustrynews.com\\\/europe-and-north-americas-largest-sawmills-struggle-to-rebuild-margins\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.timberindustrynews.com\\\/europe-and-north-americas-largest-sawmills-struggle-to-rebuild-margins\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.timberindustrynews.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/11\\\/europe-and-north-americas-largest-sawmills-struggle-to-rebuild-margins.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-11-10T08:11:15+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-11-10T22:09:48+00:00\",\"inLanguage\":\"ro-RO\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.timberindustrynews.com\\\/europe-and-north-americas-largest-sawmills-struggle-to-rebuild-margins\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ro-RO\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.timberindustrynews.com\\\/europe-and-north-americas-largest-sawmills-struggle-to-rebuild-margins\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.timberindustrynews.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/11\\\/europe-and-north-americas-largest-sawmills-struggle-to-rebuild-margins.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.timberindustrynews.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/11\\\/europe-and-north-americas-largest-sawmills-struggle-to-rebuild-margins.jpg\",\"width\":768,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Europe and North America\u2019s largest sawmills struggle to rebuild margins\"},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.timberindustrynews.com\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.timberindustrynews.com\\\/\",\"name\":\"Timber Industry News\",\"description\":\"\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.timberindustrynews.com\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.timberindustrynews.com\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"ro-RO\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.timberindustrynews.com\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Timber Industry News\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.timberindustrynews.com\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ro-RO\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.timberindustrynews.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.timberindustrynews.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2022\\\/06\\\/logo_color.svg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.timberindustrynews.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2022\\\/06\\\/logo_color.svg\",\"width\":150,\"height\":57,\"caption\":\"Timber Industry News\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.timberindustrynews.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.timberindustrynews.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/135a1ae8119d1d1755135add5b7287ff\",\"name\":\"GWMI Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ro-RO\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/7e3f366983e368f37c12ad29c07423641931b311f2561bc3cb4b4eaf6f44c3cb?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/7e3f366983e368f37c12ad29c07423641931b311f2561bc3cb4b4eaf6f44c3cb?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/7e3f366983e368f37c12ad29c07423641931b311f2561bc3cb4b4eaf6f44c3cb?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"GWMI Admin\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Europe and North America\u2019s largest sawmills struggle to rebuild margins - Timber Industry News","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/ro\/europe-and-north-americas-largest-sawmills-struggle-to-rebuild-margins\/","og_locale":"ro_RO","og_type":"article","og_title":"Europe and North America\u2019s largest sawmills struggle to rebuild margins - Timber Industry News","og_description":"Selling lumber at a higher price is offering sawmills less relief than they need. Expensive logs, freight bills and manufacturing costs continue to absorb much of the additional revenue, while uncertain orders complicate production schedules. Across Europe and North America, &hellip; Continue reading &rarr;","og_url":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/ro\/europe-and-north-americas-largest-sawmills-struggle-to-rebuild-margins\/","og_site_name":"Timber Industry News","article_published_time":"2026-11-10T08:11:15+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-11-10T22:09:48+00:00","og_image":[{"width":768,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/11\/europe-and-north-americas-largest-sawmills-struggle-to-rebuild-margins.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"GWMI Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Scris de":"GWMI Admin","Timp estimat pentru citire":"13 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/europe-and-north-americas-largest-sawmills-struggle-to-rebuild-margins\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/europe-and-north-americas-largest-sawmills-struggle-to-rebuild-margins\/"},"author":{"name":"GWMI Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/#\/schema\/person\/135a1ae8119d1d1755135add5b7287ff"},"headline":"Europe and North America\u2019s largest sawmills struggle to rebuild margins","datePublished":"2026-11-10T08:11:15+00:00","dateModified":"2026-11-10T22:09:48+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/europe-and-north-americas-largest-sawmills-struggle-to-rebuild-margins\/"},"wordCount":2615,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/europe-and-north-americas-largest-sawmills-struggle-to-rebuild-margins\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/11\/europe-and-north-americas-largest-sawmills-struggle-to-rebuild-margins.jpg","articleSection":["Daily News"],"inLanguage":"ro-RO"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/europe-and-north-americas-largest-sawmills-struggle-to-rebuild-margins\/","url":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/europe-and-north-americas-largest-sawmills-struggle-to-rebuild-margins\/","name":"Europe and North America\u2019s largest sawmills struggle to rebuild margins - Timber Industry News","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/europe-and-north-americas-largest-sawmills-struggle-to-rebuild-margins\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/europe-and-north-americas-largest-sawmills-struggle-to-rebuild-margins\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/11\/europe-and-north-americas-largest-sawmills-struggle-to-rebuild-margins.jpg","datePublished":"2026-11-10T08:11:15+00:00","dateModified":"2026-11-10T22:09:48+00:00","inLanguage":"ro-RO","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/europe-and-north-americas-largest-sawmills-struggle-to-rebuild-margins\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ro-RO","@id":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/europe-and-north-americas-largest-sawmills-struggle-to-rebuild-margins\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/11\/europe-and-north-americas-largest-sawmills-struggle-to-rebuild-margins.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/11\/europe-and-north-americas-largest-sawmills-struggle-to-rebuild-margins.jpg","width":768,"height":512,"caption":"Europe and North America\u2019s largest sawmills struggle to rebuild margins"},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/","name":"\u0218tiri din industria lemnului","description":"","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"ro-RO"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/#organization","name":"\u0218tiri din industria lemnului","url":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ro-RO","@id":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/logo_color.svg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/logo_color.svg","width":150,"height":57,"caption":"Timber Industry News"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/#\/schema\/person\/135a1ae8119d1d1755135add5b7287ff","name":"GWMI Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ro-RO","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/7e3f366983e368f37c12ad29c07423641931b311f2561bc3cb4b4eaf6f44c3cb?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/7e3f366983e368f37c12ad29c07423641931b311f2561bc3cb4b4eaf6f44c3cb?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/7e3f366983e368f37c12ad29c07423641931b311f2561bc3cb4b4eaf6f44c3cb?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"GWMI Admin"}}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/100576","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=100576"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/100576\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":100578,"href":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/100576\/revisions\/100578"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/100577"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=100576"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=100576"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=100576"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}