{"id":100079,"date":"2026-09-25T07:09:30","date_gmt":"2026-09-25T07:09:30","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/?p=100079"},"modified":"2026-09-25T18:39:43","modified_gmt":"2026-09-25T18:39:43","slug":"uk-timber-market-recovery-remains-elusive-in-2026","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/ro\/uk-timber-market-recovery-remains-elusive-in-2026\/","title":{"rendered":"UK timber market recovery remains elusive in 2026"},"content":{"rendered":"

The UK timber market is moving through another difficult year. Expectations of a gradual improvement in 2026 have weakened as construction remains subdued, private housing continues to disappoint and customers delay purchases until projects are more certain. Timber is available, but demand is not strong enough to absorb it comfortably. Inventories remain lean, margins are under pressure and purchasing has become increasingly short term.<\/p>\n

Across the market, the problem is less about physical availability than about confidence and timing. Merchants, manufacturers and importers are reluctant to carry more stock than necessary, while customers are placing orders closer to delivery dates. Forward visibility is poor and demand can change quickly from one month to the next.<\/p>\n

The UK still has a substantial underlying need for housing and refurbishment, but that has not translated into a broad recovery in timber consumption. Developers remain cautious, private housing activity is weak and repair and improvement spending has also lost momentum. The market is therefore operating well below the level many suppliers expected at the beginning of the year.<\/p>\n

There is no general shortage of material. European sawmills remain active in the UK market, panel producers are competing aggressively and hardwood availability is generally adequate. Buyers have little reason to commit early, while suppliers are finding it difficult to push through higher prices unless they are supported by clear cost changes or tighter availability in individual products.<\/p>\n

Construction still sets the tone<\/strong><\/p>\n

The weakness in construction continues to dominate timber demand. Expectations of a gradual recovery during 2026 have given way to a more difficult picture, especially in private housing and residential repair and improvement.<\/p>\n

Private housing output is expected to contract sharply during the year, while repair, maintenance and improvement activity also remains under pressure. Those two areas account for a large share of UK timber consumption through structural sawn timber, timber frame, roofing, panels, joinery, flooring, mouldings and engineered products.<\/p>\n

The government continues to pursue a substantial increase in housing delivery and has placed more emphasis on social and affordable housing, together with modern methods of construction. The immediate market, however, is still being determined by starts, project finance and order books rather than announced housing targets.<\/p>\n

Developers remain cautious about committing to new phases while sales rates are weak. Financing is still expensive compared with the pre-2022 period and the cost base for construction remains high. Housing need has not disappeared, but the timber market responds to projects that move into procurement, not to the size of the housing shortage itself.<\/p>\n

This is particularly visible in structural products. Sawn timber and OSB remain closely tied to new housing and refurbishment, while engineered products such as glulam, LVL and CLT depend heavily on the timing of larger projects. When those projects move by several months, import demand can shift just as quickly.<\/p>\n

Lean inventories are changing the trading cycle<\/strong><\/p>\n

One of the clearest features of 2026 is the reluctance to hold inventory. Merchants and distributors are buying closer to actual requirements and avoiding large forward positions unless there is a specific reason to secure material.<\/p>\n

That behaviour is understandable after several years in which expected recoveries repeatedly failed to arrive on schedule. Holding expensive timber for longer than planned ties up working capital and increases exposure to price movements. Companies are therefore trying to keep stock turns high and purchasing decisions short.<\/p>\n

The market is very different from periods when supply shortages encouraged buyers to secure several months of inventory in advance. Today, material is generally available from several origins, so there is less commercial reason to build large positions.<\/p>\n

Low inventory also creates a different risk. If construction demand improves, even moderately, merchants may need to increase purchasing quite quickly because there is less stock sitting in the system. A future recovery in imports could therefore begin with restocking before end-user consumption itself becomes particularly strong.<\/p>\n

There is little evidence of that process starting on a broad scale yet. Buyers still appear more concerned about holding excess inventory than about running short.<\/p>\n

European mills are competing for fewer orders<\/strong><\/p>\n

The UK remains one of the most important export destinations for northern European sawn timber producers, especially Sweden, Latvia and Finland. That commercial relationship is well established, but the volume of business available has weakened.<\/p>\n

European sawmills are themselves dealing with a difficult environment. Construction is subdued across much of the continent, domestic demand remains weak in several producing countries and sawlog costs remain high in parts of Scandinavia and Central Europe.<\/p>\n

The UK therefore remains an important outlet even when British demand is soft. This has kept competition between suppliers strong.<\/p>\n

Swedish producers still benefit from regular shipping links, long-standing relationships and specifications closely aligned with British merchant demand. Latvia and Finland remain the next major sources, while Germany and Norway compete in selected segments.<\/p>\n

The difficult part for mills is that weak downstream demand has not eliminated upstream cost pressure. Sawlog prices remain high in several major producing regions, while labour, energy and transport costs are still above pre-inflation levels.<\/p>\n

British buyers, however, remain resistant to higher prices. Mills therefore face a persistent squeeze between raw-material costs and the limited willingness of the market to absorb increases.<\/p>\n

Where supply is plentiful, replacement cost alone is not enough to move prices. Buyers can delay orders, compare more offers or shift origin when specification allows.<\/p>\n

Hardwood demand is uneven rather than uniformly weak<\/strong><\/p>\n

The UK hardwood market is difficult to read because demand is split across joinery, furniture, flooring, decking and specialist applications. Some customers are buying more than last year while others have reduced orders sharply.<\/p>\n

Importers are generally avoiding speculative positions and are purchasing for identified requirements. This keeps stock levels under control but makes planning harder, particularly when individual sectors move in different directions.<\/p>\n

European oak remains widely available, although prices have stayed relatively firm. Lower Chinese demand for some European grades has left more material in circulation, but this has not translated into a broad collapse in UK prices.<\/p>\n

Quality is becoming a larger concern for some buyers. Availability can be good in headline terms while the mix of grades, widths and appearance characteristics does not always match what higher-end users require.<\/p>\n

African hardwood supply is changing in a different way. Producers are increasing the amount of value-added material they offer, including scantlings, decking and semi-processed components. Sapele remains an established product in UK joinery, while tali and other species are gaining ground in exterior applications.<\/p>\n

Fuel costs remain a major issue for African suppliers because diesel is widely used for kiln drying, power generation and transport. Freight adds another significant cost. Even in a weak UK market, suppliers have limited room to cut prices aggressively without damaging margins.<\/p>\n

Species diversification is also becoming more visible. Traditional species such as sapele and iroko remain important, but supply conditions and forest composition are gradually pushing more alternative species into commercial use.<\/p>\n

Panels are moving in different directions<\/strong><\/p>\n

The wood-based panel market is much less uniform than the sawn-timber market. Furniture, fit-out, interiors, construction and manufacturing are moving at different speeds, which has created a large gap between particleboard, MDF\/HDF, plywood and OSB.<\/p>\n

Particleboard has been much stronger than the general construction picture would suggest. Furniture, interiors and manufacturing provide a broader demand base, while purchasing can also move sharply according to stock levels and individual contracts.<\/p>\n

MDF\/HDF has been more stable. Demand from interiors and furniture gives it a different profile from OSB, which remains closely exposed to structural construction and housing.<\/p>\n

Plywood is experiencing the largest change in supplier mix. Chinese material has gained substantial ground, helped by competitive pricing and broad availability. Brazilian and European suppliers remain important, but the balance has moved clearly toward China.<\/p>\n

In a market where demand is limited, landed cost carries more weight. Buyers are more willing to switch origin when specifications allow, particularly when availability is not a concern.<\/p>\n

Engineered timber is caught between long-term policy and short-term reality<\/strong><\/p>\n

CLT, glulam and LVL remain exposed to a different cycle from merchant sawn timber or general panel products. These categories depend heavily on individual projects, and monthly imports can move sharply even when the longer-term direction of the market has changed very little.<\/p>\n

The UK continues to promote greater use of timber in lower-carbon construction and off-site manufacturing. That provides a long-term foundation for engineered timber, but the immediate market is still governed by project timing.<\/p>\n

A delayed residential, commercial or public project can remove a significant amount of volume from one month and move it into another. CLT is particularly volatile because the absolute volume entering the UK remains small compared with conventional sawn timber or panels.<\/p>\n

The strategic direction and the import cycle are therefore not the same thing. Policy support can remain favourable while current trade stays weak.<\/p>\n

Costs remain difficult to pass through<\/strong><\/p>\n

Margins remain under pressure throughout the supply chain. Freight, labour, energy, finance and compliance costs remain high, while weak demand limits the ability to increase selling prices.<\/p>\n

This creates a difficult balance for manufacturers, importers and distributors. Passing every cost increase through to customers risks losing business; absorbing those increases protects volume but reduces profitability.<\/p>\n

The same pressure is visible among overseas suppliers. European mills continue to face high raw-material costs, African hardwood producers are dealing with expensive diesel and transport, and panel producers are competing in a market where buyers have several sourcing options.<\/p>\n

Weak demand therefore does not automatically mean low costs. The gap between production cost and achievable selling price remains one of the main commercial tensions across the UK timber market.<\/p>\n

2027 may begin from a low base<\/strong><\/p>\n

The market is increasingly looking toward 2027 for a more convincing improvement, but any recovery is likely to start from a weak base.<\/p>\n

Housing remains the main variable. If private housing stabilises and social and affordable housing programmes begin to feed into actual construction, sawn timber, OSB, timber frame and engineered products could all benefit.<\/p>\n

The first sign of a turn may appear in purchasing behaviour before it appears in headline construction output. A move from defensive inventory management toward modest restocking would suggest that buyers are becoming more confident about forward demand.<\/p>\n

For now, there is little sign of aggressive stock building. The market remains focused on immediate requirements and short order books.<\/p>\n

Current market position<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Segment<\/th>\nCurrent position<\/th>\nMain influence<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
Sawn timber<\/td>\nWeak demand, low inventories<\/td>\nHousing and refurbishment<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Hardwood<\/td>\nUneven and selective<\/td>\nJoinery, furniture and specialist demand<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Plywood<\/td>\nHigher import volumes<\/td>\nChinese competition and landed cost<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Particleboard<\/td>\nStrong recent inflows<\/td>\nFurniture, interiors and stock movements<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
MDF\/HDF<\/td>\nBroadly stable<\/td>\nFurniture and interior products<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
OSB<\/td>\nWeak<\/td>\nStructural construction<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
CLT \/ glulam \/ LVL<\/td>\nProject-driven and volatile<\/td>\nTiming of larger projects<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

The July import figures fit the wider market picture. Sawn timber was well below the previous year, while individual panel categories moved sharply in opposite directions. Particleboard and plywood recorded stronger physical flows, MDF\/HDF was broadly stable, and OSB and engineered products weakened.<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Product<\/th>\nJuly 2026<\/th>\nValue YoY<\/th>\nMass YoY<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
Sawn timber<\/td>\n\u00a3188.95m<\/td>\n-12.1%<\/strong><\/td>\n\u2014<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Traditional plywood<\/td>\n\u00a333.70m<\/td>\n+1.2%<\/td>\n+10.9%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
MDF\/HDF<\/td>\n\u00a333.83m<\/td>\n+0.6%<\/td>\n-1.0%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Particleboard<\/td>\n\u00a313.99m<\/td>\n+38.2%<\/strong><\/td>\n+35.7%<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
OSB<\/td>\n\u00a37.95m<\/td>\n-11.2%<\/td>\n-24.2%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
CLT<\/td>\n\u00a30.46m<\/td>\n-35.3%<\/td>\n-38.8%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Glulam<\/td>\n\u00a32.72m<\/td>\n-12.7%<\/td>\n-25.5%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
LVL<\/td>\n\u00a34.46m<\/td>\n-16.4%<\/td>\n-33.5%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Wood pellets<\/td>\n\u00a3150.1m<\/td>\n+13.2%<\/td>\n+21.8%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Sawn timber imports were valued at \u00a3188.95 million in July, down 12.1% from \u00a3214.98 million a year earlier. The month was slightly stronger than June, with import value rising 2.7%, but remained well below July 2025.<\/p>\n

The main softwood sawn-timber categories accounted for \u00a3159.47 million, down 12.6% year on year. Hardwood sawn timber reached \u00a329.49 million, down 9.6%.<\/p>\n

Sawn-timber suppliers<\/strong><\/p>\n

Sweden remained the largest source by a wide margin. July shipments were worth \u00a365.1 million, giving Sweden 34.4% of total UK sawn-timber import value. Latvia followed with \u00a333.9 million and Finland with \u00a318.5 million.<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Supplier<\/th>\nJuly value<\/th>\nUK share<\/th>\nYoY<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
Sweden<\/td>\n\u00a365.1m<\/td>\n34.4%<\/td>\n-14.3%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Latvia<\/td>\n\u00a333.9m<\/td>\n17.9%<\/td>\n-11.8%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Finlanda<\/td>\n\u00a318.5m<\/td>\n9.8%<\/td>\n-14.5%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Norway<\/td>\n\u00a35.2m<\/td>\n2.8%<\/td>\n+46.7%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Most major suppliers were below the previous year. Sweden fell 14.3%, Latvia 11.8%, Finland 14.5% and Germany 27.0%. Norway increased 46.7%, although from a much smaller base.<\/p>\n

The fall across Sweden, Latvia and Finland points to a broad reduction in purchasing rather than a loss of share by one major supplier. Northern Europe remains dominant in UK sawn timber, but the market is taking less material by value than a year earlier.<\/p>\n

Plywood supplier mix shifts further toward China<\/strong><\/p>\n

Traditional plywood imports reached 49,251 tonnes in July, up 10.9% from a year earlier, while import value increased only 1.2% to \u00a333.70 million.<\/p>\n

China supplied 31,455 tonnes, 41.0% more than in July 2025, and increased its share of UK traditional plywood imports from 50.2% to 63.9%.<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Supplier<\/th>\nJuly volume<\/th>\nUK share<\/th>\nYoY<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
China<\/td>\n31,455 t<\/td>\n63.9%<\/td>\n+41.0%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Brazilia<\/td>\n4,648 t<\/td>\n9.4%<\/td>\n-27.3%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Malaysia<\/td>\n3,792 t<\/td>\n7.7%<\/td>\n+67.4%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Brazilian plywood shipments fell 27.3% to 4,648 tonnes, while Malaysia increased 67.4% to 3,792 tonnes. Finnish volume fell 59.9%.<\/p>\n

The increase in physical plywood volume without a comparable rise in value points to a more price-competitive import mix. The supplier shift toward China has been substantial enough to alter the structure of the market within a single year.<\/p>\n

Panels: particleboard rises while OSB retreats<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Product<\/th>\nJuly value<\/th>\nValue YoY<\/th>\nMass YoY<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
Particleboard<\/td>\n\u00a313.99m<\/td>\n+38.2%<\/td>\n+35.7%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
MDF\/HDF<\/td>\n\u00a333.83m<\/td>\n+0.6%<\/td>\n-1.0%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
OSB<\/td>\n\u00a37.95m<\/td>\n-11.2%<\/td>\n-24.2%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Particleboard recorded the strongest increase among the main panel categories. Imports reached \u00a313.99 million, up 38.2% year on year, while mass increased 35.7% to 25,733 tonnes.<\/p>\n

Belgium accounted for 35.2% of imported volume and Germany 24.9%. Belgian shipments increased 63.3% and German supply rose 34.9%.<\/p>\n

OSB moved in the opposite direction. Imports fell 11.2% in value to \u00a37.95 million and 24.2% by mass to 17,293 tonnes. Ireland supplied 41.2% of the total, while Latvia increased its share to 36.6% after shipments rose 73.2%. German OSB volume fell 69.3%.<\/p>\n

MDF\/HDF imports were almost unchanged at \u00a333.83 million, up 0.6% in value, while mass declined 1.0% to 47,255 tonnes. Ireland remained the largest supplier with 34.0% of volume. China increased shipments 47.1% to 3,960 tonnes and raised its share to 8.4%.<\/p>\n

Engineered timber remains weak<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Product<\/th>\nJuly value<\/th>\nValue YoY<\/th>\nMass YoY<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
CLT<\/td>\n\u00a30.46m<\/td>\n-35.3%<\/td>\n-38.8%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Glulam<\/td>\n\u00a32.72m<\/td>\n-12.7%<\/td>\n-25.5%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
LVL<\/td>\n\u00a34.46m<\/td>\n-16.4%<\/td>\n-33.5%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

CLT imports fell 35.3% in value and 38.8% by mass. Glulam declined 12.7% in value and 25.5% by mass, while LVL fell 16.4% in value and 33.5% by mass.<\/p>\n

These remain relatively small import categories compared with conventional sawn timber and panels, so individual project shipments can alter the monthly picture quickly.<\/p>\n

Wood pellets remain separate from the construction cycle<\/strong><\/p>\n

Wood pellet imports reached 862,003 tonnes in July, 21.8% higher than a year earlier, while import value increased 13.2% to \u00a3150.1 million.<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Pellet supplier<\/th>\nJuly volume<\/th>\nUK share<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
United States<\/td>\n760,889 t<\/td>\n88.3%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Latvia<\/td>\n31,000+ t<\/td>\nApprox. 3.6%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Canada<\/td>\n31,000+ t<\/td>\nApprox. 3.6%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Estonia<\/td>\n30,926 t<\/td>\nApprox. 3.6%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The UK timber market is moving through another difficult year. Expectations of a gradual improvement in 2026 have weakened as construction remains subdued, private housing continues to disappoint and customers delay purchases until projects are more certain. Timber is available, … Continue reading →<\/span><\/a><\/p>","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":100080,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"Default","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[5204],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-100079","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-daily-news"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\nUK timber market recovery remains elusive in 2026 - Timber Industry News<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/ro\/uk-timber-market-recovery-remains-elusive-in-2026\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ro_RO\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"UK timber market recovery remains elusive in 2026 - Timber Industry News\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The UK timber market is moving through another difficult year. Expectations of a gradual improvement in 2026 have weakened as construction remains subdued, private housing continues to disappoint and customers delay purchases until projects are more certain. Timber is available, … Continue reading →\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/ro\/uk-timber-market-recovery-remains-elusive-in-2026\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Timber Industry News\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-09-25T07:09:30+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-09-25T18:39:43+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/uk-timber-market-recovery-remains-elusive-in-2026.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"670\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"GWMI Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Scris de\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"GWMI Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Timp estimat pentru citire\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"12 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/uk-timber-market-recovery-remains-elusive-in-2026\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/uk-timber-market-recovery-remains-elusive-in-2026\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"GWMI Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/#\/schema\/person\/135a1ae8119d1d1755135add5b7287ff\"},\"headline\":\"UK timber market recovery remains elusive in 2026\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-09-25T07:09:30+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-09-25T18:39:43+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/uk-timber-market-recovery-remains-elusive-in-2026\/\"},\"wordCount\":2389,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/uk-timber-market-recovery-remains-elusive-in-2026\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/uk-timber-market-recovery-remains-elusive-in-2026.jpg\",\"articleSection\":[\"Daily News\"],\"inLanguage\":\"ro-RO\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/uk-timber-market-recovery-remains-elusive-in-2026\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/uk-timber-market-recovery-remains-elusive-in-2026\/\",\"name\":\"UK timber market recovery remains elusive in 2026 - Timber Industry News\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/uk-timber-market-recovery-remains-elusive-in-2026\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/uk-timber-market-recovery-remains-elusive-in-2026\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/uk-timber-market-recovery-remains-elusive-in-2026.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-09-25T07:09:30+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-09-25T18:39:43+00:00\",\"inLanguage\":\"ro-RO\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/uk-timber-market-recovery-remains-elusive-in-2026\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ro-RO\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/uk-timber-market-recovery-remains-elusive-in-2026\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/uk-timber-market-recovery-remains-elusive-in-2026.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/uk-timber-market-recovery-remains-elusive-in-2026.jpg\",\"width\":670,\"height\":330,\"caption\":\"UK timber market recovery remains elusive in 2026\"},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/\",\"name\":\"Timber Industry News\",\"description\":\"\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"ro-RO\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Timber Industry News\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ro-RO\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/logo_color.svg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/logo_color.svg\",\"width\":150,\"height\":57,\"caption\":\"Timber Industry News\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/#\/schema\/person\/135a1ae8119d1d1755135add5b7287ff\",\"name\":\"GWMI Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ro-RO\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/7e3f366983e368f37c12ad29c07423641931b311f2561bc3cb4b4eaf6f44c3cb?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/7e3f366983e368f37c12ad29c07423641931b311f2561bc3cb4b4eaf6f44c3cb?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"GWMI Admin\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"UK timber market recovery remains elusive in 2026 - Timber Industry News","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/ro\/uk-timber-market-recovery-remains-elusive-in-2026\/","og_locale":"ro_RO","og_type":"article","og_title":"UK timber market recovery remains elusive in 2026 - Timber Industry News","og_description":"The UK timber market is moving through another difficult year. Expectations of a gradual improvement in 2026 have weakened as construction remains subdued, private housing continues to disappoint and customers delay purchases until projects are more certain. Timber is available, … Continue reading →","og_url":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/ro\/uk-timber-market-recovery-remains-elusive-in-2026\/","og_site_name":"Timber Industry News","article_published_time":"2026-09-25T07:09:30+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-09-25T18:39:43+00:00","og_image":[{"width":670,"height":330,"url":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/uk-timber-market-recovery-remains-elusive-in-2026.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"GWMI Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Scris de":"GWMI Admin","Timp estimat pentru citire":"12 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/uk-timber-market-recovery-remains-elusive-in-2026\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/uk-timber-market-recovery-remains-elusive-in-2026\/"},"author":{"name":"GWMI Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/#\/schema\/person\/135a1ae8119d1d1755135add5b7287ff"},"headline":"UK timber market recovery remains elusive in 2026","datePublished":"2026-09-25T07:09:30+00:00","dateModified":"2026-09-25T18:39:43+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/uk-timber-market-recovery-remains-elusive-in-2026\/"},"wordCount":2389,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/uk-timber-market-recovery-remains-elusive-in-2026\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/uk-timber-market-recovery-remains-elusive-in-2026.jpg","articleSection":["Daily News"],"inLanguage":"ro-RO"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/uk-timber-market-recovery-remains-elusive-in-2026\/","url":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/uk-timber-market-recovery-remains-elusive-in-2026\/","name":"UK timber market recovery remains elusive in 2026 - Timber Industry News","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/uk-timber-market-recovery-remains-elusive-in-2026\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/uk-timber-market-recovery-remains-elusive-in-2026\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/uk-timber-market-recovery-remains-elusive-in-2026.jpg","datePublished":"2026-09-25T07:09:30+00:00","dateModified":"2026-09-25T18:39:43+00:00","inLanguage":"ro-RO","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/uk-timber-market-recovery-remains-elusive-in-2026\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ro-RO","@id":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/uk-timber-market-recovery-remains-elusive-in-2026\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/uk-timber-market-recovery-remains-elusive-in-2026.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/uk-timber-market-recovery-remains-elusive-in-2026.jpg","width":670,"height":330,"caption":"UK timber market recovery remains elusive in 2026"},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/","name":"\u0218tiri din industria lemnului","description":"","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"ro-RO"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/#organization","name":"\u0218tiri din industria lemnului","url":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ro-RO","@id":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/logo_color.svg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/logo_color.svg","width":150,"height":57,"caption":"Timber Industry News"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/#\/schema\/person\/135a1ae8119d1d1755135add5b7287ff","name":"GWMI Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ro-RO","@id":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/7e3f366983e368f37c12ad29c07423641931b311f2561bc3cb4b4eaf6f44c3cb?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/7e3f366983e368f37c12ad29c07423641931b311f2561bc3cb4b4eaf6f44c3cb?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"GWMI Admin"}}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/100079","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=100079"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/100079\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":100081,"href":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/100079\/revisions\/100081"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/100080"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=100079"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=100079"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.timberindustrynews.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=100079"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}